Institution record
bybit
- Source score
- β
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFSATier-3 Astana Financial Services Authority | AFSA-A-LA-2024-0027 | Regulated | Bybit Limited | 2021-11-04 | |
NBGTier-2 National Bank of Georgia | Number pending check | Regulated | Bybit Limited | 2024-6-17 | |
CMBTier-2 Capital Markets Board of Turkey | Number pending check | Regulated | Bybit Limited | β | |
CYSECTier-2 Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission | Number pending check | Registered | Bybit Fintech Limited | 2023 | |
BVIFSCOffshore British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission | Number pending check | Offshore | Bybit Fintech Limited | 2018-03 | |
FIU-INDTier-2 Financial Intelligence Unit β India | Number pending check | Registered | Bybit Fintech Limited | 2025-02 | |
VARATier-2 Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority | Number pending check | Regulated | Bybit Limited | 2024-8-21 | |
FMATier-1 Austrian Financial Market Authority | Not supplied | Registered | Bybit Fintech Limited | 2025-05-30 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing bybit against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bybit (this record) | AFSANBGCMB+5 | 4 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
| Swissquote | FCASFCCYSEC+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
| FBS | ASICCYSECFSC | 2 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
| XNT LTD | CYSECFCAMFSA | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
| Klips | CYSECFSCA | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
| MiTRADE | CYSECASIC | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
bybit: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is bybit's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, bybit (legal entity reference: bybit) holds 8 recorded licence entries, of which 4 carry a "regulated" status and 7 are marked regulated or registered: AFSA (Astana Financial Services Authority) β licence AFSA-A-LA-2024-0027, status: regulated, Tier-3; NBG (National Bank of Georgia) β licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; CMB (Capital Markets Board of Turkey) β licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; CYSEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) β licence Number pending check, status: registered, Tier-2; BVIFSC (British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission) β licence Number pending check, status: offshore, Offshore; FIU-IND (Financial Intelligence Unit β India) β licence Number pending check, status: registered, Tier-2; VARA (Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority) β licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) β licence Not supplied, status: registered, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official AFSA, NBG, CMB public register.
Which of bybit's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
bybit is registered at 40A Orchard Road, Macdonald House, #03-01, Singapore 238838 and tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 8 recorded licences (AFSA, NBG, CMB, CYSEC, BVIFSC, FIU-IND, VARA, FMA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is bybit's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
bybit carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to bybit's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with bybit (listed execution software: Bybit Fintech Limited), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bybit.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to AFSA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to bybit's supervisory scope.
ETF Structure & Yield Engineering
Institutional ETF Creation-Redemption Arbitrage, SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Baskets, and Cross-Border UCITS Withholding Tax Yield Architecture (2026)
An empirical quantitative analysis of Authorised Participant (AP) primary-market arbitrage bands, SEC Rule 6c-11 and IRC Section 852(b)(6) in-kind capital gains shielding, fixed-income ETF NAV-to-market basis dynamics, and Irish ICAV 15% vs 30% US dividend withholding tax alpha.
Fixed Income ETFs & Market Microstructure
SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Creation Baskets, Fixed-Income ETF NAV Arbitrage & After-Tax Yield Drag Model (2026)
Authorized Participant (AP) custom creation and redemption baskets under SEC Rule 6c-11 refer to non-pro-rata fixed-income portfolio transfers that allow ETF issuers to purge low-basis, illiquid, or off-the-run bonds in-kind without realizing distributable capital gains, compressing annualized after-tax yield drag by 42 to 118 basis points compared with open-end mutual funds.
Treasury Ladders & Yield Math
SGOV vs BIL vs TLT: 30-Day SEC Yield vs Distribution Yield Math & ETF Fee Drag Analysis (2026)
30-Day SEC Yield refers to a standardized net annualized yield metric mandated by the SEC that deducts fund expense ratios from 30-day portfolio income.
Treasury Ladders & Yield Math
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: 30-Day SEC Yield vs. Trailing 12-Month Distribution Yield Audit (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing Form N-1A Item 26 accrual acco
