Skip to content
ETFYield Lab

Institution record

RBC

Royal Bank of Canada

Risk level not supplied2 of 2 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
MAS
Monetary Authority of Singapore
Number pending checkRegulatedROYAL BANK OF CANADA—Register ↗
OSFI
Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (Canada)
Number pending checkRegulatedRoyal Bank of Canada—Register ↗

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing RBC against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
RBC (this record)
MASOSFI
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Swissquote
CYSECFCASFC+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
IB
IIROCFCAASIC+2
5 / 5Risk level not supplied—0
Tiger Brokers
FINRASFCASIC+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
MUFG Bank
FCAHKMAFSA+4
7 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
Straits Financial Group
NFACFTCMAS
1 / 3Risk level not supplied—0

RBC: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is RBC's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, RBC (legal entity reference: Royal Bank of Canada) holds 2 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 2 are marked regulated or registered: MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated; OSFI (Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (Canada)) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official MAS, OSFI public register.

Which of RBC's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

RBC is tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Wealth management, Investment, Credit cards, Banking, Financial services) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 2 recorded licences (MAS, OSFI) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is RBC's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

RBC carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to RBC's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with RBC, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (rbc.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to MAS.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to RBC's supervisory scope.

All research →

Treasury Ladders & Yield Math

iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: Rolling Rung Ladder vs. T-Bill + Long-Bond Barbell Strategy (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)

iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing reinvestment risk immunization

Read briefing →

TIPS & Inflation Breakevens

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) Liquidity & Fee Audit: Rolling Rung Ladder vs. T-Bill + Long-Bond Barbell Strategy (4.20% 30-Day SEC Yield (13.56 bps ER) Benchmark)

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) Liquidity & Fee Audit (BIL-1-3M-TBILL) stands at 4.20% (30-Day SEC Yield (13.56 bps ER)) (Source: SEC EDGAR / State Street, 2026-10-20), governing reinvestment risk immunization

Read briefing →

ETF Fee Drag & SEC Yield Audits

WisdomTree (USFR) & iShares (TFLO) Treasury Floating Rate Note ETFs: Rolling Rung Ladder vs. T-Bill + Long-Bond Barbell Strategy (4.26% 30-Day SEC Yield (0.02Y Dur) Benchmark)

WisdomTree (USFR) & iShares (TFLO) Treasury Floating Rate Note ETFs (USFR-TFLO-FRN) stands at 4.26% (30-Day SEC Yield (0.02Y Dur)) (Source: U.S. Treasury FRN Auction, 2026-10-20), governing reinvestment risk immunization

Read briefing →

Corporate & Municipal Bond ETFs

iShares Short Treasury (SHV / SHY) 1–3 Year Rung Duration Analysis: Rolling Rung Ladder vs. T-Bill + Long-Bond Barbell Strategy (4.08% 2Y Par Yield Benchmark Benchmark)

iShares Short Treasury (SHV / SHY) 1–3 Year Rung Duration Analysis (SHV-SHY-SHORT) stands at 4.08% (2Y Par Yield Benchmark) (Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing reinvestment risk immunization

Read briefing →
RBC — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | ETFYield Lab