Institution record
Bitpanda
Bitpanda GmbH
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFTier-1 Autorité des marchés financiers | Number pending check | Regulated | Bitpanda GmbH | 2025-4-14 | |
CONSOBTier-1 Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa | Number pending check | Regulated | Bitpanda | — | |
FITier-1 Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority | Number pending check | Regulated | Bitpanda | — | |
BaFinTier-1 Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht | Number pending check | Regulated | Bitpanda | — |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bitpanda against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitpanda (this record) | AMFCONSOBFI+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Nordea | FIDKFSAFSA+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Deutsche Bank AG | FRSECBBaFin+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| LeasePlanbank | BaFinECBDNB | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| SEB | ECBFIN-FSAFI | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Commerzbank | BaFinECB | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Bitpanda: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Bitpanda's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Bitpanda (legal entity reference: Bitpanda GmbH) holds 4 recorded licence entries, of which 4 carry a "regulated" status and 4 are marked regulated or registered: AMF (Autorité des marchés financiers) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; CONSOB (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; FI (Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official AMF, CONSOB, FI public register.
Which of Bitpanda's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Bitpanda is tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 4 recorded licences (AMF, CONSOB, FI, BaFin) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Bitpanda's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Bitpanda carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Bitpanda's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bitpanda, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bitpanda.com/fr) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to AMF.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to Bitpanda's supervisory scope.
ETF Structure & Yield Engineering
Institutional ETF Creation-Redemption Arbitrage, SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Baskets, and Cross-Border UCITS Withholding Tax Yield Architecture (2026)
An empirical quantitative analysis of Authorised Participant (AP) primary-market arbitrage bands, SEC Rule 6c-11 and IRC Section 852(b)(6) in-kind capital gains shielding, fixed-income ETF NAV-to-market basis dynamics, and Irish ICAV 15% vs 30% US dividend withholding tax alpha.
Fixed Income ETFs & Market Microstructure
SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Creation Baskets, Fixed-Income ETF NAV Arbitrage & After-Tax Yield Drag Model (2026)
Authorized Participant (AP) custom creation and redemption baskets under SEC Rule 6c-11 refer to non-pro-rata fixed-income portfolio transfers that allow ETF issuers to purge low-basis, illiquid, or off-the-run bonds in-kind without realizing distributable capital gains, compressing annualized after-tax yield drag by 42 to 118 basis points compared with open-end mutual funds.
ETF Fee Drag & SEC Yield Audits
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: Modified Duration, DV01 & +/-100 bps Parallel Yield Shock Table (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing second-order Taylor series con
Corporate & Municipal Bond ETFs
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) Liquidity & Fee Audit: Modified Duration, DV01 & +/-100 bps Parallel Yield Shock Table (4.20% 30-Day SEC Yield (13.56 bps ER) Benchmark)
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) Liquidity & Fee Audit (BIL-1-3M-TBILL) stands at 4.20% (30-Day SEC Yield (13.56 bps ER)) (Source: SEC EDGAR / State Street, 2026-10-20), governing second-order Taylor series conv