Skip to content
ETFYield Lab

Institution record

ALB

ALB LIMITED

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
MFSATier-2
Malta Financial Services Authority
79767RegulatedALB LIMITED2017-03-30

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing ALB against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
ALB (this record)
MFSA
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
XNT LTD
CYSECFCAMFSA
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
Robinhood
FINRASECSEC+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied—0
Doo Prime
FCAFINRASEC+4
7 / 7Risk level not supplied—1
Swissquote
FCASFCCYSEC+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
EC Markets
FMAFCAASIC+2
3 / 5Risk level not supplied—0

ALB: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is ALB's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, ALB (legal entity reference: ALB LIMITED) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority) — licence 79767, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official MFSA public register.

Which of ALB's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

ALB is registered at 48, CASA ROMA, SIR AUGUSTUS BARTOLO STREET, TA’ XBIEX XBX 1099, MALTA and tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers scope based on its institutional service profile (Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (MFSA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is ALB's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

ALB carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to ALB's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with ALB, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to MFSA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to ALB's supervisory scope.

All research →

Fixed Income ETFs & Market Microstructure

SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Creation Baskets, Fixed-Income ETF NAV Arbitrage & After-Tax Yield Drag Model (2026)

Authorized Participant (AP) custom creation and redemption baskets under SEC Rule 6c-11 refer to non-pro-rata fixed-income portfolio transfers that allow ETF issuers to purge low-basis, illiquid, or off-the-run bonds in-kind without realizing distributable capital gains, compressing annualized after-tax yield drag by 42 to 118 basis points compared with open-end mutual funds.

Read briefing →

ETF Fee Drag & SEC Yield Audits

iShares iBonds & Invesco BulletShares Target-Maturity Bond Ladders: 30-Day SEC Yield vs. Trailing 12-Month Distribution Yield Audit (4.22% Held-to-Maturity Net YTW Benchmark)

iShares iBonds & Invesco BulletShares Target-Maturity Bond Ladders (IBOND-TARGET-MAT) stands at 4.22% (Held-to-Maturity Net YTW) (Source: SEC Form N-1A Target-Date Filings, 2026-10-20), governing Form N-1A Item 26 accrua

Read briefing →

Corporate & Municipal Bond ETFs

iShares iBonds & Invesco BulletShares Target-Maturity Bond Ladders: 10-Year Expense Ratio Fee Drag & Compounding Simulation ($100k) (4.22% Held-to-Maturity Net YTW Benchmark)

iShares iBonds & Invesco BulletShares Target-Maturity Bond Ladders (IBOND-TARGET-MAT) stands at 4.22% (Held-to-Maturity Net YTW) (Source: SEC Form N-1A Target-Date Filings, 2026-10-20), governing basis-point fee differen

Read briefing →

Treasury Ladders & Yield Math

iShares iBonds & Invesco BulletShares Target-Maturity Bond Ladders: Modified Duration, DV01 & +/-100 bps Parallel Yield Shock Table (4.22% Held-to-Maturity Net YTW Benchmark)

iShares iBonds & Invesco BulletShares Target-Maturity Bond Ladders (IBOND-TARGET-MAT) stands at 4.22% (Held-to-Maturity Net YTW) (Source: SEC Form N-1A Target-Date Filings, 2026-10-20), governing second-order Taylor seri

Read briefing →
ALB — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | ETFYield Lab