Institution record
AFC
AFC Holdings
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBZ Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe | Number pending check | Regulated | AFC COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED | 1999 | Register ↗ |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing AFC against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFC (this record) | RBZ | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| ADBZ | RBZ | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| CBZ Bank Limited | RBZ | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| FBCbank | RBZ | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| IDBZ | RBZ | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Steward Bank | RBZ | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
AFC: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is AFC's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, AFC (legal entity reference: AFC Holdings) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: RBZ (Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official RBZ public register.
Which of AFC's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
AFC is tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (RBZ) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is AFC's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
AFC carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to AFC's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with AFC, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (afcholdings.co.zw) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to RBZ.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to AFC's supervisory scope.
Fixed Income ETFs & Market Microstructure
SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Creation Baskets, Fixed-Income ETF NAV Arbitrage & After-Tax Yield Drag Model (2026)
Authorized Participant (AP) custom creation and redemption baskets under SEC Rule 6c-11 refer to non-pro-rata fixed-income portfolio transfers that allow ETF issuers to purge low-basis, illiquid, or off-the-run bonds in-kind without realizing distributable capital gains, compressing annualized after-tax yield drag by 42 to 118 basis points compared with open-end mutual funds.
Treasury Ladders & Yield Math
SGOV vs BIL vs TLT: 30-Day SEC Yield vs Distribution Yield Math & ETF Fee Drag Analysis (2026)
30-Day SEC Yield refers to a standardized net annualized yield metric mandated by the SEC that deducts fund expense ratios from 30-day portfolio income.
Treasury Ladders & Yield Math
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: 30-Day SEC Yield vs. Trailing 12-Month Distribution Yield Audit (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing Form N-1A Item 26 accrual acco
TIPS & Inflation Breakevens
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: 10-Year Expense Ratio Fee Drag & Compounding Simulation ($100k) (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing basis-point fee differentials,